Tony Field
New member
The ability to use ISO 3200 (or ISO 50) is rather strange. Is this an "uncalibrated but sort of legitimate" ISO value or just "extra amplification and the same results can be achieved by using ISO 1600 and playing with photoshop"?
My personal tests indicate that 3200 is better than "push processing" an ISO 1600 image in photoshop (using either raw or jpg). Of course, that could be my inability in photoshop.
My personal tests indicate that 3200 is better than "push processing" an ISO 1600 image in photoshop (using either raw or jpg). Of course, that could be my inability in photoshop.