View Full Version : White Background…
Nicolas Claris
December 6th, 2007, 11:02 AM
I've been asked for a white bacground without changing other website colors.
You may choose this style if you don't like the subtle light blue one…
The option is in the "Quick Style Chooser" button at down below on the left of the brown bar of all forums pages it is called:
"NC white Background"
There is also a
"NC Black text - white background" style as well.
Warning!
This is not a reason for sending me other requests, I can't make a style for each of us…
Have all a good day.
Charles L Webster
December 6th, 2007, 01:39 PM
How odd, I see no difference between any of the settings and the default, which for me is black text on a white background.
Nicolas Claris
December 6th, 2007, 01:51 PM
Bonsoir Charles
odd it is!
is your monitor calibrated?
What OS and web browser do you use? have you tried with another browser?
Charles L Webster
December 6th, 2007, 11:30 PM
Of course my monitor is calibrated ;-)
I'm using Firefox 2.0.0.10 on XP SP1. I don't have another browser, but can open this page in an IE browser in FF. But still see no difference between the settings.
Greg Rogers
December 7th, 2007, 12:24 AM
Chas, you need to click on the very top one, just "NC Styles" to see the light blue background. It appears to be a header (or title), but it's not, it's a selection. That's my guess, anyway. (I'm on Firefox 2.0.0.11)
Cheers,
Greg
Nicolas Claris
December 7th, 2007, 01:19 AM
It appears to be a header (or title), but it's not, it's a selection. That's my guess, anyway. (I'm on Firefox 2.0.0.11)
"NC style" is the default style
Others are substyles to "NC style"…
Ray West
December 7th, 2007, 04:03 AM
Hi Charles,
You really got to stare at it.... on the darker blue windows desktop, if that is what you have, you probably won't notice the difference - open opf into two windows, you may see the differences, its only part of the window, - the rgb is 247,250,255, this reply box is 245,245,255. changing it to white makes the majority of it 255,255,255 but the reply box is a very beautiful 225,225,226 I think Nicolas is being very subtle, or he missed one there. (www.colorschemer.com for ColorPix for a free download to amaze our Mac friends)
It should all really br a grey card grey, I guess. with yellow text - if I could be bothered I could have some fun here...
Best wishes,
Ray
Nicolas Claris
December 8th, 2007, 05:55 AM
And the thin lines around the thread/posts boxes are 0,70,155…;-)
Antonio Correia
March 4th, 2008, 07:57 AM
In my opinion what is missing as default is NC White Text - Black Background or NC Grey Text - Black Background
Either one.
Even photos look better in dark background !
This forum - http://www.dslrforum.com (http://www.dslrforum.com/index.php) - is so flexible that it let us to choose some colors :) always with black background.
Great option indeed. But I think it only works when we are logged in.
There, you can see my mother at the top right corner !! :)
---
And again: why can't I post 4 or 5 pictures in a thread ?
Do I have to make 4 or 5 threads to do so ?
Why ?
___
Why can't I place my avatar in my profile ?
Antonio Correia
March 5th, 2008, 01:45 PM
I defy you to make a poll on the colors of this forum.
We could then see which is the general opinion. I do know - or I think I know - that you have already made such a work or a similar one.
But people can change their minds, can't they ?
I bet that black background and grey or white text is the most voted option.
And... if this option is not the most voted why isn't this option available ?
What is the problem ?
:) :)
Bart_van_der_Wolf
March 5th, 2008, 02:02 PM
I bet that black background and grey or white text is the most voted option.
White text on a black background is ergonomically almost the worst choice.
Bart
Antonio Correia
March 5th, 2008, 02:40 PM
White text on a black background is ergonomically almost the worst choice.
Bart
There we are: one opinion !
So far so good. More.
Asher Kelman
March 5th, 2008, 02:44 PM
Antonio my good friend, Hi!
Are you having issues posting 4 images together? That should work every time. OTOH, is it an issue to have to use 2 posts to get in 8 images?
We already have issues with people putting up 4 unrelated images to comment on.
You generally post related images so more is fine as one can discuss them together. Makes sense.
AsherIn my opinion what is missing as default is NC White Text - Black Background or NC Grey Text - Black Background
Either one.
Even photos look better in dark background !
This forum - http://www.dslrforum.com (http://www.dslrforum.com/index.php) - is so flexible that it let us to choose some colors :) always with black background.
Great option indeed. But I think it only works when we are logged in.
There, you can see my mother at the top right corner !! :)
---
And again: why can't I post 4 or 5 pictures in a thread ?
Do I have to make 4 or 5 threads to do so ?
Why ?
___
Why can't I place my avatar in my profile ?
Antonio Correia
March 5th, 2008, 02:53 PM
White text on a black background is ergonomically almost the worst choice.
Bart
Bart. And light grey text with black background ?
Still the same opinion ?
Bart_van_der_Wolf
March 5th, 2008, 05:16 PM
Bart. And light grey text with black background ?
Still the same opinion ?
The problem with a black background is that it will be influenced by ambient room light. On a monitor with a glossy surface it will reflect everything in the room, which is stressing for your eyes. On a non-glossy monitor surface, the room lights will reduce overall contrast by lifting the black level. White letters on a dark background cause more fatigue for the eyes.
A white background (if not set too bright) is best to reduce the ambient light influence, and it makes the pupils of the eyes contract which generally helps to get better focus (increased DOF) which helps for small text.
Viewing photo's on screen requires to reduce the contrast between background and image if we want to avoid influencing the perceived brightness of the image. At normal viewing distances, a narrow (5-10mm) border with average edge luminosity should be enough to compensate for the adaptation of our eyes, and isolate the image from its surroundings.
Bart
Antonio Correia
March 5th, 2008, 05:32 PM
The problem with a black background is that it will be influenced by ambient room light. On a monitor with a glossy surface it will reflect everything in the room, which is stressing for your eyes. On a non-glossy monitor surface, the room lights will reduce overall contrast by lifting the black level. White letters on a dark background cause more fatigue for the eyes.
A white background (if not set too bright) is best to reduce the ambient light influence, and it makes the pupils of the eyes contract which generally helps to get better focus (increased DOF) which helps for small text.
Viewing photo's on screen requires to reduce the contrast between background and image if we want to avoid influencing the perceived brightness of the image. At normal viewing distances, a narrow (5-10mm) border with average edge luminosity should be enough to compensate for the adaptation of our eyes, and isolate the image from its surroundings.
Bart
OK. Nice and kind justification.
Interesting approach ... but subjected to personal option, perhaps.
And why not give the freedom of choice to users ?
I would use black and you would use white.
Our neighbor could use blue, red, whatever...
A poll ? No ... Yes ... May be ... ?
I say no more on this. End.
Thank you :)
Adam Currey
April 3rd, 2008, 03:45 AM
Hello.
Sorry to make my first post on this forum a whinge, but I felt I had to put in my $0.02. The very first thing I did when signing up was go straight to the User CP change the colour scheme, because the default one is (sorry to be so blunt) just awful. I find it very hard on the eyes. All the other colour schemes seem to be almost identical with the exception of the text colour. I'd love to see one much darker and with more contrast.
Thanks,
Adam
Doug_Kerr
April 3rd, 2008, 04:19 AM
Hi, Antonio,
* Apressemo-nos a sucumbir à tentação antes que ela se desvaneça
* Hurry up and give in to temptation before it fades away
* Dépêchons-nous de succomber à la tentation avant qu'elle ne s'éloigne - Epicuro
A nice sentiment.
It is interesting that in the French (and I think in the Portuguese) it is ourselves being encouraged to hurry, whereas in the English it is the "reader(s)". Perhaps just one of those arbitrary differences in idiom (and in English the first person imperatives are indeed clumsy - "let us . . ."!), but perhaps also it reflects a real cultural distinction!
Antonio Correia
April 3rd, 2008, 05:59 AM
Hi, Antonio,
A nice sentiment.
It is interesting that in the French (and I think in the Portuguese) it is ourselves being encouraged to hurry, whereas in the English it is the "reader(s)". Perhaps just one of those arbitrary differences in idiom (and in English the first person imperatives are indeed clumsy - "let us . . ."!), but perhaps also it reflects a real cultural distinction!
Hello Doug
Perhaps it's more the translation that can be in-correct.
But we all get the idea ...
:) :)
Antonio Correia
April 3rd, 2008, 06:00 AM
Hello.
Sorry to make my first post on this forum a whinge, but I felt I had to put in my $0.02. The very first thing I did when signing up was go straight to the User CP change the colour scheme, because the default one is (sorry to be so blunt) just awful. I find it very hard on the eyes. All the other colour schemes seem to be almost identical with the exception of the text colour. I'd love to see one much darker and with more contrast.
Thanks,
Adam
Another opinion. Great.
Thanks. :)