Michael Fontana
June 29th, 2008, 03:09 AM
Is there a typical archistyle of shooting?
Yes, look at the images:
Meanwhile most (non-archi) photographers would have choosed that type of cam position - obviuosly without the child, but my son Roman was getting bored, when scouting the location ;-) - so this beeing a °table-top°-type image, still live or kinda packshot, of chair, bed and table:
http://imago.macbay.de/OPF/testshot.jpg
The best view of the room in architecture language is the next:
everything is done to allow the best lecture of the room itself: it reduces the space to floor, wall, window and door and some furniture; it's all about architecture.
The importance of the furniture is scaled down, the door becomes a partner of the bed, the balk has disappeared, etc.
http://imago.macbay.de/OPF/archistyle.jpg
BTW: The table is from famous Alvar Aalto, I like it, but the photo's duty is to show the space.
Both shots were done with a 24 mm... resp. the 2nd one with the distagon 25... so no Ultra-wide!
Another example:
http://imago.macbay.de/OPF/archistyle_2.jpg
The space situation is quit complex; holding the cam orthogonal to the door makes it better readable. Again distagon 25; the room isn't very wide, but a ultrawide lens would have destroyed the feeling how the space is organised.
Yes, look at the images:
Meanwhile most (non-archi) photographers would have choosed that type of cam position - obviuosly without the child, but my son Roman was getting bored, when scouting the location ;-) - so this beeing a °table-top°-type image, still live or kinda packshot, of chair, bed and table:
http://imago.macbay.de/OPF/testshot.jpg
The best view of the room in architecture language is the next:
everything is done to allow the best lecture of the room itself: it reduces the space to floor, wall, window and door and some furniture; it's all about architecture.
The importance of the furniture is scaled down, the door becomes a partner of the bed, the balk has disappeared, etc.
http://imago.macbay.de/OPF/archistyle.jpg
BTW: The table is from famous Alvar Aalto, I like it, but the photo's duty is to show the space.
Both shots were done with a 24 mm... resp. the 2nd one with the distagon 25... so no Ultra-wide!
Another example:
http://imago.macbay.de/OPF/archistyle_2.jpg
The space situation is quit complex; holding the cam orthogonal to the door makes it better readable. Again distagon 25; the room isn't very wide, but a ultrawide lens would have destroyed the feeling how the space is organised.