![]() |
|
HOME
FORUMS
NEWS
FAQ
SEARCH
|
|
|||||||
| Still Photo: Approaching Fine Photography Photography as a visual artform open to any serious picture, where photography is the mode of our expression. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
An older image but one I still like. A scan of a very old image of a young woman - a relative of our neighbour - merged with a 35mm film scan of a guy in Victoria, British Columbia, who seemed intent on striking up temporarily meaningful relationships with passing tourists. Imagine what might have transpired if these two people, from eras separated by at least 50 years, met after enjoying cucumber sandwiches and the sound of tinkling teacups at the still traditional Hotel Victoria.
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi, Michael,
Quote:
It should provide good fodder for the doomed debate that rages here from time to time as to whether "art should stand on its own without need for explication". Thanks. Best regards, Doug |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Mike,
It is an intriguing piece of art, thanks for sharing it. Do you have other works similar to this one? It would be a stronger theme if you'd care to make a project out of it. Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Mike,
In a word - Splendid! I very much would like to see more! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The girl is timeless. Alfred Steiglitz could have photographed her. The man and the story don't add anything for me I'm afraid.
__________________
[SIZE="2"][FONT="Garamond"]He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949[/FONT][/SIZE] [url]http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com[/url] |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the kind comments Doug, John, Cem, Jim. The old photo of the girl is indeed timeless, as Jim points out. The name of the photographer is lost in history but he/she most likely had a studio in Thunder Bay, Ontario. The photograph was pretty battered and needed quite a bit of Photoshop restoration.
The image is part of a series, Cem and John, some of which are on earlier OPF links: http://www.openphotographyforums.com...0939#post20939 and http://www.openphotographyforums.com...ead.php?t=3804. Those images are as follows. ![]() ![]() All the images in the series have a psychological theme: What is the person thinking and feeling behind the mask of a fairly neutral facial expression? They all coalesce technically because of B/W presentation and the inclusion of scanned objects (the young woman by the cars is a scan of a plaster-of-Paris statuette). Although I adhere loosely to the doctrine that "art should stand on its own", Doug, that doesn't mean a photograph is not art if it benefits from text - the 'art object' then becomes the image plus text. There's lots of precedents for that view. Is multimedia not art because it combines different components? I agree with you that such debate is doomed. My take is that what we call art provides an interpretive context that the image maker may hint at, but in the end it's the viewers discretion. Thanks again Mike |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|