Open Photography Forums  

Go Back   Open Photography Forums > Uptown: Explore at your risk! Beware! You hold OPF harmless by you participation! > Photography of Strife, Disaster, Rescue and Hope: empathy, yes, but no propaganda!

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 26th, 2009, 09:04 AM
ashik ikbal ashik ikbal is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: bangladesh
Posts: 76
Default Living in Paradox

Dhaka the capital City of Bangladesh. This is the densest city after Mumbai in South Asia. In this image I have tried to convey the discrepancy of urban living standard. The economically weaker dwellers somehow survive in the temporary shelters. No hospital, no education and safety are beyond thinking.

In recent years we are trying to bridge the gap, itís a mammoth job nonetheless.

** I couldnít manage the panorama joining flawlessly. The exposer went different. Wanting feedback from Photoshop maestros.

Reply With Quote
Old January 26th, 2009, 10:08 AM
Ken Tanaka Ken Tanaka is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,300

This is quite a panorama, Ashik. Certainly not one of the usual tired Grand Canyon shots.

The wealth gap you've portrayed is certainly apparent and stark. Speaking purely photographically, however, two aspects of this image jumped at me before the social disparity message.

First, there is no sign of humanity in that river whatsoever. I've never visited Dhaka or this part of the planet, but I was really struck first by that big gash of a river with not even a boat floating in it. It certainly draws the line you want to portray, but it must be a veritable sewer, eh?

Second, I noticed that you clipped the tops of the tall building at the top of the frame. (You also have a stitch error apparent up there.) You'll be amazed at how restoring the top of that building, if possible, will help to drop the eye back to the area of the image you want people to notice.

One last note. I'm not certain that "paradox" is accurately the idea you're trying to convey. For example, a "paradox" might be a photo of a $300,000 Bentley rolling through a fast-food drive-thru. Rather, I think you're trying to convey a sense of co-locational dichotomy.

Thank you for posting this interesting, insightful image, Ashik. What was your vantage point?
- Ken Tanaka -
Reply With Quote
Old January 26th, 2009, 10:28 AM
ashik ikbal ashik ikbal is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: bangladesh
Posts: 76

thanks tanaka. i admit to your verdict. how could i miss the tip of that tall one !!

stiching went wrong, cuz i felt i could join it flawlessly into my pc.
even i could have shot this in Panorama Mode, which would be easier to join by the supplied software with the camera.

dichotomy: is well descripting. actually this word not familiar to me.
Reply With Quote
Old February 17th, 2009, 08:54 PM
Alain Briot Alain Briot is offline
pro member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,423


So, in conclusion, you need to change the title of this thread to "Living in a co-locational dichotomy" ;-)
Alain Briot
Fine Art, workshops, books: Get 40 Free eBooks when you subscribe to my newsletter:
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Posting images or text grants license to OPF, yet © of such remain with its creator. Still, all assembled discussion © 2006-2017 Asher Kelman (all rights reserved) Posts with new theme or unusual image might be moved/copied to a new thread!