Open Photography Forums  
HOME FORUMS NEWS FAQ SEARCH

Go Back   Open Photography Forums > Digital Darkroom > Retouching & Repairing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 14th, 2008, 11:03 AM
Trudy Montgomery Trudy Montgomery is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 41
Default what would you do with this?

I need to transform this awful shot into a semi-decent one... do you have any pointers or suggestion on this for me?

Here is what I've got to work with....



Here is what I've come up with so far....


I could go on about what I don't like in both versions, but I would like to see what those of you not invested in these have to say before I influence any opinions.


.................................................. .................................................. ...................
I'm not requesting that you do any photoshopping to this, just tell me what you would do... I know my way around photoshop pretty well and will be able to figure out how to do whatever you describe. However you do have permission to play with the picture if you can't resist.

thanks for looking!
~trudy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 14th, 2008, 01:10 PM
Kathy Rappaport Kathy Rappaport is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,793
Default Not so tight

I wouldn't crop it so close and the blur doesn't work for me - it looks out of focus.

I'd crop it to a long panorama and add a border or vignette with just the feet. And I'd probably do it in sepia or leave it in color over the black and white. The bottom blanket is just too dark in BW
__________________
You can call me ChatKat
********************
I created this piece of fine art. It's Fine Art because it's mine, I made it and I say it's fine art...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 14th, 2008, 10:20 PM
Duke Beattie Duke Beattie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kalispell, MT
Posts: 160
Default

Depending on what the photo is of.. baby? or just feet....
I would go with this for baby..

or this for just the feet--
__________________
Are we having fun yet?
Kalispell MT. USA
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 14th, 2008, 10:46 PM
Trudy Montgomery Trudy Montgomery is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 41
Default

Thank you Kathy and Duke.... I would not have thought of doing Sepia to a baby feet photo... but I do like the results.

Duke the picture was suppose to be a focus on the little feet the mother really wanted a shot of her girls feet... but we never did get all three to sit for the shot... this was just a snap I did to check my settings... so at least I got one shot of their toesies. Next time I'm asked to do a foot shot I think I'll try getting my subjects on a couch and shooting the feet from slightly under.... actually I better go and experiment with my own kids for good foot angles before there is a next time!!!


~trudy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 15th, 2008, 04:23 AM
JohanElzenga JohanElzenga is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 84
Default

I would never use sepia for a shot like this. It reminds me of a microscopic image of some insect...
__________________
Johan W. Elzenga, Editor / Photographer
http://www.johanfoto.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old October 15th, 2008, 12:01 PM
Kathy Rappaport Kathy Rappaport is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,793
Default

So then what would you do to salvage this shot?
__________________
You can call me ChatKat
********************
I created this piece of fine art. It's Fine Art because it's mine, I made it and I say it's fine art...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old October 22nd, 2008, 08:24 AM
charlotte thompson charlotte thompson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 2,573
Default

Trudy

I just saw this post-interesting so here is my 2 cents- will be back later

Charlotte-


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old October 22nd, 2008, 08:55 AM
Sean DeMerchant Sean DeMerchant is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington State, USA
Posts: 735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trudy Montgomery View Post
I need to transform this awful shot into a semi-decent one... do you have any pointers or suggestion on this for me?

I could go on about what I don't like in both versions, but I would like to see what those of you not invested in these have to say before I influence any opinions.
Reshoot the shots. The garbage in, garbage out principle is just as true in photography as it is in other fields. If you do not like the shot, then do not use it. Taking a shot that works often takes orders of magnitude less time and effort for achieving a goal than doing the same with post processing in most cases.

some thoughts,


Sean
__________________
[I]"In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends." [/I]- Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968)
[URL="http://www.envisagement.com/"]http://www.envisagement.com/[/URL]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old October 22nd, 2008, 10:03 AM
Daniel Buck Daniel Buck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean DeMerchant View Post
Reshoot the shots. The garbage in, garbage out principle is just as true in photography as it is in other fields. If you do not like the shot, then do not use it.
at the risk of sounding harsh, I would completely agree. Yes, post work can give an image a good look and feel, but it doesn't make the image. If you have an "awful" shot, It's probably best to move on and try the shot again. In most cases (in my opinion) you may end up with a photograph that looks like it has had 'to much processing', if you understand what I mean. And if you've done alot of heavy cropping, you're not going to have an image large enough to print well. :)

As for how to improve the shot, if you have the opportunity again, my first thought would be to open up the lens and see how thin you can get the DOF. Maybe you can make the feet stand out alot more (since the feet seem to be the main subject). I think it's a nice idea for a photo, all the feet of various sizes :) I think the composition is really what is lacking in the photo. Your cropping on the 2nd image looks better, removing all of the faces from the photo, leaving you with just the feet to concentrate on as a viewer.
__________________
Daniel Buck - Photographer and 3d artist
photography: 404Photography.net - BuckshotsBlog.com
3d work: DanielBuck.net
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old October 22nd, 2008, 10:29 AM
Jim Galli Jim Galli is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 687
Default here's mine


quickie CS3 workflow;
  • crop at a slight angle to balance all of the 'feet'
  • change to bw discard color
  • change back to rgb
  • in levels tweak blue and red to give a nasty oversaturated yellow brown cast
  • in hue / saturation desaturate about 96% so that just a hint of warm tint is left
  • make duplicate layer and convert to soft light. Slide soft light back to where it looks right, about 58% iirc
  • flatten layers
  • brighten a bit in curves.
  • sharpen just a tiny bit like 15%


This may seem like a lot of fiddling to the novice but it only took a few seconds. You get a favorite work flow pattern and you kind of stick with it.
__________________
[SIZE="2"][FONT="Garamond"]He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949[/FONT][/SIZE]

[url]http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com[/url]
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old October 25th, 2008, 01:12 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is offline
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32,600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trudy Montogomery
Here is what I've got to work with....



Here is what I've come up with so far....


And now let me comment on Jim Galli's fine work:



Galli;60816]

Excellent rendition. Photography, at its best can, would and should require going over all apspects of the picture. What elements are needed. What is the function of color. What is the essence of the image. How can it best be represented. This has always been true. The best photography involves a contemplative process that is improved by having a conversation with one self and the picture being made.

I exclude from this pictures by pros where they make what the client needs by setting everything as wanted and tripping the shutter. So no getting mad at me just because you are a highly skilled and successful photographer.

Trudy,

Here what Jim has done is found the essence, jettisoned the irrelevant color and faces upper bodoes to celebrate a line of little tiny feet. Now we know what it's about, the tonality in RGB makes the picture warmer, more like film with some nuanced tone from the wet chemical development process.

The brightness in the image also gives feeling that an angel visited and gently painted light over the image to finish it. This is how a photograph is made. It's work. Not hard work, but nevertheless it must be an iterative process between the artist and the work in which the essence of the picture is discovered and the milieu is such that life is breathed into its nostril and it lives.

So kudos to both of you. Trudy, you recognized the beauty you embedded in your photograph. Jim, you took over and brought out what I think Trudy saw.

Trudy, is this true or am I merely enjoying the benefits of the pain pills I take?

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old October 25th, 2008, 11:01 PM
Trudy Montgomery Trudy Montgomery is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 41
Default

Jim, Thank you, you really did transform this picture!

Asher, Yes the essence of the picture is the row of tiny feet... however I only got this one shot (which was merely a quick snap to check my settings) before all those little feet decided they did not want to sit another second. Thank you again, Jim for helping to turn this less then ordinary snap shot into something better.... I'll get to work on duplicating what you did and post my version soon :)

~trudy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Posting images or text grants license to OPF, yet of such remain with its creator. Still, all assembled discussion 2006-2017 Asher Kelman (all rights reserved) Posts with new theme or unusual image might be moved/copied to a new thread!