Open Photography Forums  
HOME FORUMS NEWS FAQ SEARCH

Go Back   Open Photography Forums > Digital Darkroom > Retouching & Repairing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 18th, 2013, 06:12 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is offline
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32,600
Default Explain the artifacts in this picture!

The FBI released this picture from a video.



Explain the artifacts around the suspects and in front of the wall edge to the right but not the people in front. Have these figures been added in a composite to a new b.g. to obscure what the FBI knows. More pictures here

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 19th, 2013, 01:21 AM
Jerome Marot Jerome Marot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Munich, Germany.
Posts: 3,495
Default

I would say that these artifacts look similar to the ones appearing in most video streams. You can't really compare stills extracted from a video stream to a well processed jpeg. Even if the principles behind the compressions are similar and the artifacts therefore also similar, video compression is optimized to be fast, not accurate and adds the intricacies of inter-frame compression. One gets more artifacts and typically on flat, detail-less zones as is the ground here. The processor keeps the bits for the zones with more details, which usually correspond to the subject, and the eye is not that sensitive to fugitive artifacts on flat zones.

It is of course possible that the pictures have been doctored, but it does not need to be so.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 19th, 2013, 01:26 AM
Sandrine Bascouert Sandrine Bascouert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brighton (UK)
Posts: 991
Default

It looks to me that they have tried to increase the definition (for me, the contrast) of the particulars as opposite to the rest. Sure the image have been manipulated, but I can't see the trace of a new BG... Not that I am an expert through. It just resembles the result of CCTV footage I tried to enhance myself long time ago.

That the FBI cannot do better than me is reassuring in a sense :)
__________________
Sandrine: the genuine "5th wheel of the wagon". Second to none! Established 1970.
website
C&C always welcome!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comment & Critique 101 Cem_Usakligil Layback Cafe 29 March 27th, 2016 12:10 PM
Dealing with criticism of one's own work. Asher Kelman Art Theory: Idea workshop. 69 August 30th, 2015 07:02 PM
Demosaicing artifacts Doug Kerr Imaging Technology: Theory, Alternatives, Practice and Advances. 1 November 19th, 2011 11:29 AM
Fantasy Pictures made of elements. The Language I Attempt to Use Asher Kelman Art Theory: Idea workshop. 4 August 18th, 2010 06:23 PM
Critique Desired: A truly contemplative picture. In addition to the grain, what's your feelings on this Asher Kelman Still Photo: Approaching Fine Photography 18 February 5th, 2009 07:43 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Posting images or text grants license to OPF, yet © of such remain with its creator. Still, all assembled discussion © 2006-2017 Asher Kelman (all rights reserved) Posts with new theme or unusual image might be moved/copied to a new thread!