Open Photography Forums  
HOME FORUMS NEWS FAQ SEARCH

Go Back   Open Photography Forums > Art Theory: Idea workshop.

Art Theory: Idea workshop. Warning, not the truth here, just a venture. Examining what makes an image worthy of saving and what it does for us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 10th, 2013, 06:35 AM
Michael Nagel Michael Nagel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Munich/Germany
Posts: 2,275
Lightbulb Bauhaus Photography - forgotten?

Bauhaus is primarily known for its architecture, but the Bauhaus movement opened up new ways and paved the way for photography away from documentary to a separate discipline of art.
The influence can still be seen - simply compare what you see on the following links with contemporary photography:

Official Bauhaus page.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Photoinduced Article

Best regards,
Michael
__________________
I do not call myself an artist, I just try to capture what I see.
If you need many words to describe what your picture means, it doesn't speak enough for itself.
my photos on flickr - here is the portion posted in OPF.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 10th, 2013, 02:54 PM
Tom dinning Tom dinning is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Darwin NT Australia
Posts: 2,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Nagel View Post
Bauhaus is primarily known for its architecture, but the Bauhaus movement opened up new ways and paved the way for photography away from documentary to a separate discipline of art.
The influence can still be seen - simply compare what you see on the following links with contemporary photography:

Official Bauhaus page.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Photoinduced Article

Best regards,
Michael
Having been teethed on Bauhaus among others during my submissive period it is still alive and well in my subconscious although I do notice, when I mention it to my classes they all scramble for their iPads to see if there is an app that covers it.
Thank you, Michael, for rekindling an old fire.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 10th, 2013, 06:42 PM
George Holroyd George Holroyd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hungary
Posts: 276
Default

Bauhaus and the post-Bauhaus solo work of Peter Murphy (up through the Deep album) has had a huge impact on my photography.
__________________
George E. Holroyd III
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 11th, 2013, 09:31 AM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is online now
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 34,582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Nagel View Post
Bauhaus is primarily known for its architecture, but the Bauhaus movement opened up new ways and paved the way for photography away from documentary to a separate discipline of art.
The influence can still be seen - simply compare what you see on the following links with contemporary photography:

Official Bauhaus page.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Photoinduced Article

Best regards,
Michael
Thanks for these links, Michael,

Is it a movement of collective enlightenment and cross pollination of ideas that's the real Bauhaus or is it the particulars of vision, style or construction?

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old March 11th, 2013, 01:15 PM
Michael Nagel Michael Nagel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Munich/Germany
Posts: 2,275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asher Kelman View Post
Thanks for these links, Michael,

Is it a movement of collective enlightenment and cross pollination of ideas that's the real Bauhaus or is it the particulars of vision, style or construction?

Asher
Asher,

Bauhaus had also the character of a school - it was a place where new ideas were explored and refined. The impact remembered by most when hearing the name is Architecture, but it is also Design, Typography and Photography which became part of the workshops in 1929.

Citation:

Photography

During the Weimar phase of the Bauhaus, photography was initially used as a documentation and publication medium before it was established as an artistic field of experimentation, ranging from the photogram to the photo collage, by László Moholy-Nagy in 1923. Photography only became an official subject in Dessau in 1929, when it was integrated into the advertising workshop. Photography at the Bauhaus was mainly associated with figures such as László Moholy-Nagy, Walter Peterhans, Lucia Moholy and Erich Consemüller.


It was driven by individuals but flourished as a subject within the ideas of Bauhaus.
Bauhaus Architecture has still significant influence today.
Opening the way for Photography as a separate discipline of Art is very important for all who followed - this self-portrait from Herbert Bayer is one of the well-known works which taps into Surrealism.

Look a the works of the different Artists and see how much is familiar to you because the same elements are still used and explored further.

Best regards,
Michael
__________________
I do not call myself an artist, I just try to capture what I see.
If you need many words to describe what your picture means, it doesn't speak enough for itself.
my photos on flickr - here is the portion posted in OPF.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old March 11th, 2013, 01:28 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is online now
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 34,582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Nagel View Post
Asher,

Bauhaus had also the character of a school - it was a place where new ideas were explored and refined. The impact remembered by most when hearing the name is Architecture, but it is also Design, Typography and Photography which became part of the workshops in 1929.

Citation:

Photography

During the Weimar phase of the Bauhaus, photography was initially used as a documentation and publication medium before it was established as an artistic field of experimentation, ranging from the photogram to the photo collage, by László Moholy-Nagy in 1923. Photography only became an official subject in Dessau in 1929, when it was integrated into the advertising workshop. Photography at the Bauhaus was mainly associated with figures such as László Moholy-Nagy, Walter Peterhans, Lucia Moholy and Erich Consemüller.


It was driven by individuals but flourished as a subject within the ideas of Bauhaus.
Bauhaus Architecture has still significant influence today.
Opening the way for Photography as a separate discipline of Art is very important for all who followed - this self-portrait from Herbert Bayer is one of the well-known works which taps into Surrealism.

Look a the works of the different Artists and see how much is familiar to you because the same elements are still used and explored further.
Michael,

I'm no authority on the Bauhaus movement and workshop for exchange of creative ideas. I live in a Bauhaus-Lloyd Wright mongrel of a home! But that an expert, does not me make, LOL! Still, I do wonder about it's place as a center for photography more than design with photography as one could claim that, "It merely housed Lazlo Moholy-Nagy and Lucia, his equally talented wife, (and several others you've mentioned), but really the teaching stars and leaders were from Essen, Stuttgart and other German centers".

What would be the Bauhaus photographic style that distinguishes its photographers and their students from the products of the premier centers in Germany at that time? I ask this not as a challenge, as I have no information myself to distinguish between the fame of the Bauhaus photographers we know and the other eminent photographers of the same time period who had powerful influence on photography. IOW, what makes them be taken as a "movement" or "school" in the way Bauhaus applies to architecture and design? Are there distinguishing traits of sensibility or form of photography that we could say are uniquely Bauhaus?

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old March 12th, 2013, 02:24 PM
Michael Nagel Michael Nagel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Munich/Germany
Posts: 2,275
Default

Asher,

when you mention Bauhaus, don't forget to mention Dessau - the geographical center of the movement.

Photography was initially - as mentioned before - driven by individuals, but resulted in the creation of a separate class for photography which was no longer part of the advertising workshop.

Bauhaus started primarily as school for architecture and design, but extended into typography and photography.

The most important influences that can be recognized (as far as I see it) are the drive to abstraction and surrealism.

Best regards,
Michael
__________________
I do not call myself an artist, I just try to capture what I see.
If you need many words to describe what your picture means, it doesn't speak enough for itself.
my photos on flickr - here is the portion posted in OPF.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old March 14th, 2013, 06:15 AM
George Holroyd George Holroyd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hungary
Posts: 276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Holroyd View Post
Bauhaus and the post-Bauhaus solo work of Peter Murphy (up through the Deep album) has had a huge impact on my photography.
For those who aren't familiar with the subject of my little joke, here's an example, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fULORaFDZTo.
__________________
George E. Holroyd III
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old July 25th, 2014, 02:09 PM
Jenny Gavin-Wear Jenny Gavin-Wear is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 8
Default

Sorry if it's a bad thing to resurrect an old thread, but this is interesting.

I read a little about Bauhaus a while ago. If I was asked to try and summarise it in one sentence I would have said, "life shown in art". Would this be a fair summary?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old July 25th, 2014, 02:19 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is online now
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 34,582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenny Gavin-Wear View Post
Sorry if it's a bad thing to resurrect an old thread, but this is interesting.

I read a little about Bauhaus a while ago. If I was asked to try and summarise it in one sentence I would have said, "life shown in art". Would this be a fair summary?
Perhaps "Art embedded into life"!

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old July 25th, 2014, 02:25 PM
Jenny Gavin-Wear Jenny Gavin-Wear is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asher Kelman View Post
Perhaps "Art embedded into life"!

Asher
Interesting. I thought it was how, for example, human form was used to inspire design?

Hmm .. you made me think. Care to expand?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old August 24th, 2016, 01:29 PM
Michael Nagel Michael Nagel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Munich/Germany
Posts: 2,275
Default

The Harvard Art Museums just put a large collection of Bauhaus Art online (related Wired article).

The section covering photography is here.

Best regards,
Michael
__________________
I do not call myself an artist, I just try to capture what I see.
If you need many words to describe what your picture means, it doesn't speak enough for itself.
my photos on flickr - here is the portion posted in OPF.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The hypocrisy of "Fine Art Photography"! Will Thompson Photography as Art 107 April 23rd, 2013 07:06 AM
Discussion on Street Photography Kevin Stecyk Photojournalism - Street - Documentary 52 February 23rd, 2011 06:30 PM
Photography and Art in OPF Cem_Usakligil Photography as Art 17 March 9th, 2009 03:03 PM
Aesthetic impact of photography upon 19th century art world? Colin Dow Photography as Art 3 December 31st, 2008 11:04 AM
The neophyte and photography... a long, boring essay Rachel Foster Entry Digital Photography 4 December 29th, 2007 03:41 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Posting images or text grants license to OPF, yet © of such remain with its creator. Still, all assembled discussion © 2006-2017 Asher Kelman (all rights reserved) Posts with new theme or unusual image might be moved/copied to a new thread!