• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Apprentices

C

Cedric MASSOULIER

New member
Young students drawing on banks of the Seine...

lesquaisdessinateursa4rz8.jpg


Yashica Electro 35 GTN, Tri-X 400, film scan
 
M

Michael_Stones

Member
Nice one Cedric, I like the downward angle & contrast with the black water a lot. What film scanner do you have? You can't use digital ice for clean-up with B&W, or couldn't when I last read up on it. Did you have much cleaning to do?
Cheers
Mike
 
C

Cedric MASSOULIER

New member
Michael_Stones said:
Nice one Cedric, I like the downward angle & contrast with the black water a lot. What film scanner do you have? You can't use digital ice for clean-up with B&W, or couldn't when I last read up on it. Did you have much cleaning to do?
Cheers
Mike
Click to expand...

Thank you Mike. Well, i use a poor scanner, one included in my Canon MP970 printer. I don't have advanced feature like ICE... But, to be honest about my scanner, it is very slow (6 minutes to scan a BW picture with 4800 dpi resolution and 16bits depth) but offers very clean files : i don't have any problem with noise. My problem is with definition : scanned images are not really sharp, i think that my scanner's lens is not very precisely focused. With a "big grain" film as Tri-X 400, it doesn't matter because grain is much bigger than scanner's resolution, but with high resolution films as Velvia 50, i hardly get good sharp files.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top