Asher Kelman
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
We are used to the two approaches to moving water with film: blurred v. sharp pictues isolating single water drops.
The scanning backs of yield, IMHO some of the most spectacular pictures ever with unending resolution at economical prices!
However, the rendering of moving water brings new artifacts with all this wonder.
From this thread,
http://www.openphotographyforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=571&page=2
We are introduced to a Rainbow effect in moving water by Jack Flesher's images here
http://web1.omniblog.com/_smartsite/modules/home/showcase.php?uid=102
The rainbow effect I didn't see on Jim's pictures of the beach. http://collum.omniblog.com/
I see this is a big challenge.
1. What solutions do people have for this unattactive artifact in otherwise breathing photography?
2. Is it related to the color effect seen present on the pictures of white flowers too?
Asher
The scanning backs of yield, IMHO some of the most spectacular pictures ever with unending resolution at economical prices!
However, the rendering of moving water brings new artifacts with all this wonder.
From this thread,
http://www.openphotographyforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=571&page=2
We are introduced to a Rainbow effect in moving water by Jack Flesher's images here
http://web1.omniblog.com/_smartsite/modules/home/showcase.php?uid=102
The rainbow effect I didn't see on Jim's pictures of the beach. http://collum.omniblog.com/
I see this is a big challenge.
1. What solutions do people have for this unattactive artifact in otherwise breathing photography?
2. Is it related to the color effect seen present on the pictures of white flowers too?
Asher