• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Pano's, should I be refocusing?

Doug Kerr

Well-known member
Hi, Ben,

Doug, I keep hearing this on forums but in real life it just isn't true, the change in magnification is so very slight that modern software negates it automatically so that everything lines up. It's a non issue as you can see from these examples, sounds good and technical but is inconsequental in the field.

Sure, and what I said is true from a theoretical standpoint, but as I said, I had no idea if the phenomenon would be consequential in magnitude.

I know older versions of PTGUI couldn't work with refocusing due to the change in magnification and even the present version needs you to decouple the focal length indicator from the images but Autopano Pro does it all automatically and works like a dream.

Well, it's sure nice to have neat tools!

Best regards,

Doug
 

Ben Rubinstein

pro member
I have to admit to be loving it. The last image is 30 megabytes and has huge amounts of resolution but took only a minute to shoot using a 5D and just one lens on a tripod. Cheap, easy and fast and I have a wide choice of clean ISO's (seem to be using a base of 400 for most of these stitches to freeze the foliage/people when stopped down). I'm now experimenting with people in the images, trick is to make sure they only occupy one of the frames of the stitches and with plenty of room around them to make the stitch work.
 
I'm now experimenting with people in the images, trick is to make sure they only occupy one of the frames of the stitches and with plenty of room around them to make the stitch work.

Hi Ben,

You can also remove them completely if you make sure that you have at least 2 overlapping shots where the people have moved to different positions. This can also be applied semi-automaticaly in some blenders by masking the people out with an alpha layer before auto-blending the tiles.

Bart
 

Ben Rubinstein

pro member
There is a way to do this in PS by taking multiple frames then stacking them, not sure how, if anyone knows I'd appreciate it, seems to me a good way to kill moving foliage as well.
 
There is a way to do this in PS by taking multiple frames then stacking them, not sure how, if anyone knows I'd appreciate it, seems to me a good way to kill moving foliage as well.

Hi Ben,

I believe that would require the extended version of CS3, which I don't have. That allows to combine layers in a median average mode, which will remove features that are only present in e.g. 1 out of 3 layers.

A feature of CS3 (any version) not mentioned often is that it apparently honors the alpha mask when blending (pano) layers together. That would allow to selectively disable certain features from 2 or more layer blends, by just adding an alpha mask.

Bart
 
Top