Open Photography Forums  
HOME FORUMS NEWS FAQ SEARCH

Go Back   Open Photography Forums > Digital Camera Discussion > Medium Format & Large Format Cameras > Shooting with a Pentax 645 D MF camera

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 30th, 2013, 06:49 AM
Nicolas Claris Nicolas Claris is offline
Administrator/Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bordeaux
Posts: 5,761
Default Micro Adjustements

I’ve been following Bart Van der Wolf technique for many years it is amazingly accurate but one needs to have a camera with a live view…
Since I use the Pentax 645D, one missing feature of this camera is… live view.
During every day work, this is not a real issue, but to achieve a precise micro adjustment of all my lens, I had to find a very reliable method.
Then I remembered Michael Tapes (a fair guy who worked with Asher and I to set-up OPF years ago. Unfortunately for us, but we did understand the « whys », he had to leave us and focus (pun intended) on his own business.
As far as I remember, Michael started with a pretty good grey card (I still use it when needed) and then spent months to elaborate a reliable technique to achieve precise micro-adjustments.
So I bought his software FocusTune and the LensAlign target, not a heavy investment!
I won’t explain here how I used it, it’s much more simple to read Michael’s website and information Center
I just wished to testify, that it is really simple to use, you just have to be precise, use with methodic approach, step by step and you’ll be set!
ONLY avoid any low voltage lighting (such as LEDs), otherwise you’ll get crazy with the random results…
Before using Michael’s tape focusing tools, I did my own settings by try and guess, and there were quite precise, but now… wow ! I have almost a new camera…


Visit Michael's website.



PS I paid the full price to Michael, this post is absolutely for your information, only.
__________________
WEBSITE - FACEBOOK - INSTAGRAM
Please do no repost my images elsewhere than OPF without my permission.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 30th, 2013, 10:00 AM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is offline
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 34,745
Default

I'm pleased, Nicolas, that you make this post. We have a lot to be thankful to Michael Tapes for his hard work in helping us set up OPF when Rob Galbraith's forum ended as it did.

This tool my Michael has involved a lot of iterations and that it works as it should is simply Michaels devotion to detail and his honesty. But the extra special payback is that it helps you in your mission-critical work, (where Bart's methodology can't work), and you get such a precise adjustment that the camera seems perfect. This is a completion of a circle and very satisfying!

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 30th, 2013, 02:57 PM
Doug Kerr Doug Kerr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Alamogordo, New Mexico, USA
Posts: 8,558
Default

Hi, Nicolas,

I have an earlier version of this instrument. I do not use it for micro adjustment of AF, as I have no cameras that offer that. But I do use it for AF accuracy testing.

I was very impressed by the clever and meticulous engineering and the nice construction.

The latest model has some nice new features.

Best regards,

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 30th, 2013, 05:41 PM
Bart_van_der_Wolf Bart_van_der_Wolf is offline
pro member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 4,054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Kerr View Post
I was very impressed by the clever and meticulous engineering and the nice construction.
Hi Doug,

I agree, based on an earlier LensAlign version that was part of my beta testing it shortly before final release. Further refinements have been made since. It is obvious that a lot of thought has gone into such a deceivingly 'simple' (as in 'angled ruler') looking (to the casual observer) device. Small things like how the hinge point of the ruler retains a relatively close correlation between the ruler and the plane of optimal focus reveal that attention to detail. It all helps to reduce the number of variables involved in honing in on an optimal AFMA setting.

I had a look earlier at the pre-release version of FocusTune, and it seemed to do what was advertised, also for those cameras/lenses that do not offer fully automatic evaluation.

One observation though, I've noticed that the light quality (spectral composition or color temperature) at which the focus optimization is determined, can have an influence on the optimum one arrives at.

That may have to do with the fact that the AF sensors of some cameras may be sensitive to a spectrum that differs from the sensor sensitivity itself. The sensor is usually filtered for IR, and for most (non-Apochromatically corrected) lenses the focus plane for e.g. tungsten weighted light sources is at a different position than average daylight requires to correct for. The AF sensor in an SLR may not be filtered the same way as the imaging sensor.

Cheers,
Bart
__________________
If you do what you did, you'll get what you got.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old December 30th, 2013, 06:59 PM
Doug Kerr Doug Kerr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Alamogordo, New Mexico, USA
Posts: 8,558
Default

Hi, Bart,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart_van_der_Wolf View Post
Hi Doug,

I agree, based on an earlier LensAlign version that was part of my beta testing it shortly before final release. Further refinements have been made since. It is obvious that a lot of thought has gone into such a deceivingly 'simple' (as in 'angled ruler') looking (to the casual observer) device. Small things like how the hinge point of the ruler retains a relatively close correlation between the ruler and the plane of optimal focus reveal that attention to detail. It all helps to reduce the number of variables involved in honing in on an optimal AFMA setting.
Indeed.

Quote:
One observation though, I've noticed that the light quality (spectral composition or color temperature) at which the focus optimization is determined, can have an influence on the optimum one arrives at.

That may have to do with the fact that the AF sensors of some cameras may be sensitive to a spectrum that differs from the sensor sensitivity itself. The sensor is usually filtered for IR, and for most (non-Apochromatically corrected) lenses the focus plane for e.g. tungsten weighted light sources is at a different position than average daylight requires to correct for. The AF sensor in an SLR may not be filtered the same way as the imaging sensor.
That very well might be.

Thanks.

Best regards,

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old December 31st, 2013, 01:59 AM
Nicolas Claris Nicolas Claris is offline
Administrator/Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bordeaux
Posts: 5,761
Default

Good to see you guys commenting into this thread!
Yes the lighting is very important, as I wrote in the OT low voltage lamps bring aberration in the analysis by ttypohe SW. Best, of course is to use daylight. AFAIK Michael is talking about this in his site, but I can't remember where…
__________________
WEBSITE - FACEBOOK - INSTAGRAM
Please do no repost my images elsewhere than OPF without my permission.

Last edited by Nicolas Claris; December 31st, 2013 at 10:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old December 31st, 2013, 08:19 AM
Michael Tapes Michael Tapes is offline
OPF Administrator/Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 243
Default Thanks and hi!

Hi Guys,

Good to be back. Looks familiar. Same faces :>)

Thanks for the kind words. Yes, have been busy with further development on both LensALign and Focustune. WhiBal got a complete overhaul (redesign) a few years back and are still going strong. I have been able to very much optimize LensAlign and FocusTune to work with each other. Where the earlier versions of FT just read the face of the target and selected the sharpest one and so forth, the new FT v3 now can read the ruler in space, and properly determine the relative back/front position of each shot in the test series. This now gives a much fuller picture (pun) of the Af performance and how best to adjust it. Also, did a lot of work on target design, and created a new Generation 3 target that can slip onto any existing MkII LensAlign. Turns out that the Af system are quite fussy about the target, and will focus to a different plane based on the target design. I think my design is the appropriate solution. I have not seen a target as "neutral" in terms of AF consistency and proper resultant plane of focus.

Anyway, enough with the ad. Thanks again, and allow me to wish all at OPF a happy holiday season and a great 2014.

Photographically I have been shooting micro-4/3 for most things, but D800E for birds in flight. You can take a look here if you like. Comments always welcome. http://mtapesphotos.com. (The flight gallery is not yet posted, but will be soon).

See you all next time.
__________________
Michael Tapes
Owner: Michael Tapes Design
Creator: WhiBal - Instant JPEG from Raw - LensAlign
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old December 31st, 2013, 08:30 AM
Doug Kerr Doug Kerr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Alamogordo, New Mexico, USA
Posts: 8,558
Default

Hi, Michael,

So nice to have you visit us again.

I have not been very active in the AF poking and tweaking field for a while, but I'm excited to learn of the thoughtful and well-crafted advances there you bring to us.

Happy New Year.

Best regards,

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old December 31st, 2013, 11:11 AM
Michael Nagel Michael Nagel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Munich/Germany
Posts: 2,289
Default

Hi Michael,

I have been watching the development of this sort of tool for some time. The help your tool provides for correct alignment is a big plus.

There is however one thing the user of the tool has to think of and add to the setup (this mainly applies to phase AF):
The correct light.

From my experience AF modules do not behave the same depending on the light temperature.
A correct focus at 5500K is unfortunately no absolute guarantee for the same behavior at 2700K.

What are your experiences on this?

Best regards,
Michael
__________________
I do not call myself an artist, I just try to capture what I see.
If you need many words to describe what your picture means, it doesn't speak enough for itself.
my photos on flickr - here is the portion posted in OPF.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lens Hoods For micro 4/3 Lenses Robert Watcher All other DSLR's and Four Thirds, 4/3 3 July 20th, 2012 03:14 PM
Canon EF lenses - the micro USM drive Doug Kerr Canon Eos Mount DSLRs 1 December 28th, 2010 08:00 AM
News: Micro EVF for DSLRs by Redrock Micro Asher Kelman Moving Pictures and Sound Recording 7 October 9th, 2010 12:04 PM
New Micro 4/3 lens from Noktor Benard Quek Breaking News 3 March 12th, 2010 01:22 PM
Olympus / Panasonic announce new lens mount (Micro Four Thirds) Dawid Loubser All other DSLR's and Four Thirds, 4/3 8 August 9th, 2008 12:09 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Posting images or text grants license to OPF, yet © of such remain with its creator. Still, all assembled discussion © 2006-2017 Asher Kelman (all rights reserved) Posts with new theme or unusual image might be moved/copied to a new thread!