Open Photography Forums  
HOME FORUMS NEWS FAQ SEARCH

Go Back   Open Photography Forums > OPF Welcome Hall > Breaking News

Breaking News Updates, innovations, equipment: moderated!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 5th, 2008, 07:18 AM
John_Nevill John_Nevill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 581
Default Could in-camera bracketing improve Dynamic Range?

Panasonic unveils developments of a new sensor that fires bracketed exposures at1.5ms intervals to help boost dynamic range.

For more info take a look at here

Although in its infancy and currently working at a sensor size of only 177x144px, this has to be a significant leap forward in HDR capture. Just one press of the shutter could produce 3 overlayed exposures which are combined and processed in-camera. This could see the end to blown highlights and improved shadow detail.

The limiting factor of current HDR techniques is the need to stick to relatively static subjects, due to the timing between manual frames, perhaps this technique could eradicate it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 5th, 2008, 09:46 AM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is online now
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John_Nevill View Post
Panasonic unveils developments of a new sensor that fires bracketed exposures at1.5ms intervals to help boost dynamic range.

For more info take a look at here

Although in its infancy and currently working at a sensor size of only 177x144px, this has to be a significant leap forward in HDR capture. Just one press of the shutter could produce 3 overlayed exposures which are combined and processed in-camera. This could see the end to blown highlights and improved shadow detail.

The limiting factor of current HDR techniques is the need to stick to relatively static subjects, due to the timing between manual frames, perhaps this technique could eradicate it.
John,

Hello reality! This work is beautiful. About time marketing and engineers started to think about what we need instead of packing more pixels. Of course this is the correct strategy in principal but the perhaps wrong path. CMOS sensors can be made so that each pixel is independently controlled like a single cell camera. Pixels can easily be shut off in at the rate of 1/150,000 sec. Other pixels can be collecting photons as long as possible.

Companies like Texas instruments are likely to be putting such ideas into mass produced Kodak and HP $300 cameras since the market scale is so massive. Grandma with her little digicam will take pictures that span bright sky and water to a toddler in the shade of a beach chair.

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.

Last edited by Asher Kelman; February 5th, 2008 at 10:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 5th, 2008, 10:34 AM
Nikolai Sklobovsky Nikolai Sklobovsky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Posts: 1,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asher Kelman View Post
John,

Hello reality! Of course this is the correct strategy in principal but the perhaps wrong path. CMOS sensors can be made so that each pixel is independently controlled like a single cell camera or binned to be a multi-cell camera. Thus one can throw out ISO concepts except for the pixels receiving less light. Pixels can easily be shut off in at the rate of 1/150,000 sec. Other pixels can be collecting photons as long as possible.

Companies like Texas instruments are likely to be putting such ideas into mass produced $300 cameras since the market scale is so massive. Grandma with her little digicam will take pictures that span bright sky and water to a toddler in the shade of a beach chair.

Asher

Asher
Pixel-based ISO control is a very cool concept, but it also implies that the camera should recongnize the goal of the particular image. Grandma on the beach example is fine, but imagine a studio shoot going for the highkey or the lowkey look. In the first case camera would try to turn the blown bg into nicely look light gray (220,220,220), showing all the possible wrinkle of the not-so-perfect backdrop, and in the second one it will try to boost the bg into something like (20,20,20), again showing all the possible bg defects and defeating the very goal of the image. I think this level of the AI is still eons ahead of us.

But Panasonic the idea instant bracketing, ie.e of having several images from one shot - me likie!

I think both ideas have merits: pixel-based correction can be used in consumer P&S while the instant bracketing could improve the life of the pro/prosumer world.
__________________
Nikolai
Sr.Software Engineer
PhotoSoCal, Digital Grin, LA Shooters, NAPP, PPA
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 5th, 2008, 11:20 AM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is online now
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32,719
Default

Nikolai,

One would have menus like studio shot, beach and touch screen to adjust what is or isn't corrected!

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 5th, 2008, 11:41 AM
Nikolai Sklobovsky Nikolai Sklobovsky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Posts: 1,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asher Kelman View Post
Nikolai,

One would have menus like studio shot, beach and touch screen to adjust what is or isn't corrected!

Asher
well, in that case, I want two and at the lower price that I paid for my 40D :-)
__________________
Nikolai
Sr.Software Engineer
PhotoSoCal, Digital Grin, LA Shooters, NAPP, PPA
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 5th, 2008, 03:37 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is online now
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32,719
Default

Nikolai,

There are two ways that advances will come to us. One is from the top of the lines where the market is tiny and the technology has to be recovered with few customers.

However, the second method is surprising in that companies can indeed put out to the massive consumer digicam market advances that will be startling. By putting the cutting edge algorithms in a chip allows the work of the greatest creators to be commoditized.

This is a revolutionary approach to mass marketing, where modest gear can indeed pay handsomely for the massive R&D. TI simply devotes themselves to packing their inventions into chips that others can use. Think of them as commodity Digic chips but made by Texas Instruments and others.

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Posting images or text grants license to OPF, yet of such remain with its creator. Still, all assembled discussion 2006-2017 Asher Kelman (all rights reserved) Posts with new theme or unusual image might be moved/copied to a new thread!