![]() |
|
HOME
FORUMS
NEWS
FAQ
SEARCH
|
|
|||||||
| Wildlife Any creature of the wild: in the air, sea, on safari or your backyard!. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok...something new for me. I hate using flash on Wildlife, especially on birds but this nest location left me no choice. Nest was in a strange lighting location. Yes I know there a twigs in the way but that the way it is in the wild. I'm not one who likes to photoshop every little thing to make a perfect picture...just not the way it was captured.
With all that said how did i do with the fill flash on the white birds? 200-400MM F4 Nikkor lens ISO 400 Shutter 1/200 Aperture F10 Tripod - (and that hated flash i dislike so much ;) ) Thanks for any feed back and 2 days until Costa Rica!! ![]() ![]()
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The second image is wonderful. Well, they all are, but especially the second.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Funny birds! Great pics. I'm very entertained. Did you have your flash on-camera? Nice subtle fill flash if so, well done anyhow.
Nikon's flash system is top-notch, did you use flash compensation? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Challenging situation, Eric - looks like there's fairly bright sun on parts of the white birds (see some blown out detail on the head in the first shot), with darker shadows elsewhere. Definitely a situation where fill-flash might be of benefit.
What was the shooting distance, was the Better Beamer (or similar device) used, and was Flash Exposure Compensation (or even Flash Exposure Lock) used? In such situations, when time allows, I'll try to take some shots with and without fill-flash, or alter my settings, and see how much effect there is. Depending on the specifics, it can have more effect in some situations than in others. Neat shots, regardless. And be prepared to use your flash in Costa Rica, because sometimes you just plain need it. I prefer to shoot without it as well, but sometimes you do what you gotta do! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eric, nice stuff.
The first one is very quirky, the third one is cool and the middle one is awesome! What a great moment. The chooky in the middle is pure humour. There's narrative all over this. Impressed. I reckon you could drop the exposure back and lose nothing and gain some more impact. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like all three. I think the fill work best by far in the second one.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd call this a most judicious employment of fill. These are superb. I'm with the others on the second image; it has enormous possibilities.
Thanks for showing, Wendy
__________________
Photography deals exquisitely with appearances, but nothing is what it appears to be. ~Duane Michals http://wendythurman.com |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks all for the feed back. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the added detail. And you're absolutely right about this - that funky eye reflect that you often get with fill-flash, or flash of any type, is definitely the main reason to avoid flash when possible.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cus. White Bal. White card or Gray card better? | Pat Yuen | CM Theory and Practice | 28 | September 3rd, 2010 10:45 AM |
| White balance and exposure determination | Doug Kerr | CM Theory and Practice | 34 | May 5th, 2009 09:39 AM |
| New review of white balance tools | Doug Kerr | CM Theory and Practice | 21 | October 15th, 2008 02:17 PM |
| Color correction info in EOS JPG files? | Doug Kerr | Canon Eos Mount DSLRs | 27 | March 9th, 2008 12:19 PM |
| Welcome to the White Balance Forum | Michael Tapes | CM Theory and Practice | 0 | May 19th, 2006 08:35 AM |