Open Photography Forums  
HOME FORUMS NEWS FAQ SEARCH

Go Back   Open Photography Forums > Digital Camera Discussion > Lenses: DSLR and Rangefinder, MF adaptions to 35mm such Zoerk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 23rd, 2011, 04:59 PM
jake klein jake klein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: minnesota
Posts: 565
Default Tokina AT-X Pro D 300mm f2.8

This lens must be discountinued. It is on Tokina's archive. I've read the few reviews and have gotten the impression it is a great lens at a price closer to nikons 300mm f4. I cannot find one used.

I am wondering if anyone here has any experience with this lens or the sigma and tamron offerings. A lens at this focal length and apeture is something I'm looking to purchase before summer.

thanks
jake
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 23rd, 2011, 05:28 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is offline
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 24,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jake klein View Post
This lens must be discountinued. It is on Tokina's archive. I've read the few reviews and have gotten the impression it is a great lens at a price closer to nikons 300mm f4. I cannot find one used.

I am wondering if anyone here has any experience with this lens or the sigma and tamron offerings. A lens at this focal length and apeture is something I'm looking to purchase before summer.

thanks
jake
Look every day at http://KEH.com

For sure they will have a great lens for you. What they call bargain will still work well! :)

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 23rd, 2011, 06:12 PM
jake klein jake klein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: minnesota
Posts: 565
Default

something like this?

http://www.keh.com/camera/Nikon-Auto...990592930?r=FE


All three 300f2.8's all say film only in the headline? and at $665 that would be a bargain!

Also on a side note I'm torn between lenses in the 300mm f2.8 area and 85mm 1.4. I still haven't quite made up my mind between the two focal lengths. In fact i want both! Just can't afford both at the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 23rd, 2011, 06:32 PM
John Angulat John Angulat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 1,272
Default

Hi Jake,
"film only" is KEH's odd way of stating it's a non-DX lens.
I'd question the actual use you'd get from a 300mm.
What are you shooting? What plans do you have for the lens?
If I look at what you've posted so far, it's a lot of candids and close-ups, not the stuff you'd normally use a 300mm for.
Are you really going to get much that much use from it?
IMO I'd rather see you invest in the 85mm.
__________________
Warm regards,
John Angulat
www.lightsimage.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 23rd, 2011, 07:46 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is offline
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 24,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Angulat View Post
Hi Jake,
I'd question the actual use you'd get from a 300mm.
What are you shooting? What plans do you have for the lens?
John is so right! I sold my Canon 300 2.8 since I discovered that for birding it was not long enough and for most of my other work I used either 50 mm or else 70-200 and either 85,, or about 130mm. It so happens that everyone who makes lenses, make superb 85 or 90mm lens that all function very well.

I also agree that you need to take stock of what you are shooting. So ask, "In what way does your present line up limit my work?

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 23rd, 2011, 08:41 PM
jake klein jake klein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: minnesota
Posts: 565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Angulat View Post
Hi Jake,
"film only" is KEH's odd way of stating it's a non-DX lens.
I'd question the actual use you'd get from a 300mm.
What are you shooting? What plans do you have for the lens?
If I look at what you've posted so far, it's a lot of candids and close-ups, not the stuff you'd normally use a 300mm for.
Are you really going to get much that much use from it?
IMO I'd rather see you invest in the 85mm.
Yes many candids and close-ups, which i love. As summer is arriving in just a few short months my normal shooting arena will most likely be outdoor, parks, football pick up games, basketball. I also have 16 acres on a lake in the country. On my crop body(D90) the fov is near 450mm fov already on a 300mm and with an addition of a teleconverter (1.4-2) would put me in reach of the eagles, peregrine falcons, woodpeckers, turtles, etc? correct? I could also see this length as a great portrait/full body lens as well(with sb800's and pocket wizards)? I would have really loved something in the range last year at the Minnesota state fair.

The 85mm 1.4 is a for sure thing by next winter when I'm back indoors for the time being.

Are my thoughts in the wrong direction?

thanks
jake
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 23rd, 2011, 10:42 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is offline
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 24,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jake klein View Post
Yes many candids and close-ups, which i love. As summer is arriving in just a few short months my normal shooting arena will most likely be outdoor, parks, football pick up games, basketball. I also have 16 acres on a lake in the country. On my crop body(D90) the fov is near 450mm fov already on a 300mm and with an addition of a teleconverter (1.4-2) would put me in reach of the eagles, peregrine falcons, woodpeckers, turtles, etc? correct? I could also see this length as a great portrait/full body lens as well(with sb800's and pocket wizards)? I would have really loved something in the range last year at the Minnesota state fair.

The 85mm 1.4 is a for sure thing by next winter when I'm back indoors for the time being.

Are my thoughts in the wrong direction?

thanks
jake

Jake,

So, with what you outline as your goals and intentions for the new lens, it's about your convictions in actually doing the work you propose and your the power of your pocket book. The difference between could and should is either ethics or reaching a goal based on opportunity. So if you are not harming your essential needs and responsibilities and have the resources, just go for it. But 300 mm is insufficient for you ,even with the multiplication factor. You need to go to at least 400mm. Consider a 50-500 "Bigma" zoom or a similar.




Rent first to be usre you have the right lens. You do have to schlepp it with you. You'll need , no doubt, a good sized tripod and a gimbal mount would be an asset, plus all the time you need to find the critters you seek!

For me, the sheet pleasure and ease shooting the available, but, (unfortunate), captive animals in the zoo, makes the equation of cost, (in effort, time and lenses), v. results advantageous for my limited resources and circumscribed drive to photograph them. Unless I'd be going on safari, I'm satisfied with a 70-200 2.8. Otherwise, I assure you, I'd rent and go first class with the best lenses available for that rare and costly opportunity to see abundant wildlife in natural surroundings. By a lake, I'd look for frogs and lizards under leaves, praying mantis and wild flowers. These I can master with reasonable effort and no expenditures.

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 24th, 2011, 05:20 AM
jake klein jake klein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: minnesota
Posts: 565
Default

Thank you both for the advice.

Well I have a 1k budget for a lens by summer so I am curently just doing research and I am not locked into anything in my mind at the moment. I plan on some testing at the local camera shop. As the original post is for the Tokina I've really just loved the build of this 100mm macro and can only hope they bring out some fast primes.

I'm really just getting some brainstorming going on in my head as to what I really want and need.


A fast wide angle also is bouncing around in my head.

thanks
jake
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old February 8th, 2011, 06:22 AM
jake klein jake klein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: minnesota
Posts: 565
Default

So i picked up a mint used Nikon 85mm f1.4 if af-d last night and couldn't be happier! I cannot even tell this thing is used.

thanks for the advice everyone.

jake
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old February 8th, 2011, 10:19 AM
John Angulat John Angulat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 1,272
Default

Great news Jake, glad you're happy!
__________________
Warm regards,
John Angulat
www.lightsimage.com
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old February 8th, 2011, 10:35 AM
jake klein jake klein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: minnesota
Posts: 565
Default

Thanks john. I haven't gotten my state tax return in yet and that bargain tamron sp 300 f2.8 is for $665 is looking sweet right now too. Although i dream alot, when the time comes to purchase I believe I'll take the right path and lean towards some more off camera flash and shoot through umbrella/stands.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old February 8th, 2011, 05:20 PM
John Angulat John Angulat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 1,272
Default

Hi Jake,
The thanks really goes to Asher for all his advice in this thread.
Take a realistic view of what you truly enjoy shooting (or want to) and build your kit around that.
I think you're off to a great start.
IMO, I think you'd gain far more use from some prudent lens purchases to round out your needs.
Winter's drawing to a close and you'll be back outside sooner than you think.
I'd hold off on the lighting purchases for now.
__________________
Warm regards,
John Angulat
www.lightsimage.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old February 8th, 2011, 10:43 PM
jake klein jake klein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: minnesota
Posts: 565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Angulat View Post
Hi Jake,
The thanks really goes to Asher for all his advice in this thread.
Take a realistic view of what you truly enjoy shooting (or want to) and build your kit around that.
I think you're off to a great start.
IMO, I think you'd gain far more use from some prudent lens purchases to round out your needs.
Winter's drawing to a close and you'll be back outside sooner than you think.
I'd hold off on the lighting purchases for now.
Yes I see your point on summer being so close although my budget isnt' quite reaching my wants for the next peices of glass. My dream system, 24 1.4, 35 1.4, 50 1.2/50 1.4, 85 1.4, 135 f2 dc, 200 f2, 400 f2.8. The first, and last two are years and years away. And the rest aren't in my budget over the summer, thats why i thought about an added flash.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon EF 70-200mm L IS F2.8 vs F4 Cem_Usakligil Lenses: DSLR and Rangefinder, MF adaptions to 35mm such Zoerk 77 February 1st, 2010 06:29 AM
Who Owns a Nikon 35-70 F2.8 Zoom? doug anderson Lenses: DSLR and Rangefinder, MF adaptions to 35mm such Zoerk 2 August 6th, 2008 04:27 PM
Olympus E-420 w. 25mm f2.8 pancake announced Martin Kuivenhoven All other DSLR's and Four Thirds, 4/3 1 March 5th, 2008 08:58 AM
Tokina 800mm f/8 (screw mount): First Impressions Dawid Loubser Lenses: DSLR and Rangefinder, MF adaptions to 35mm such Zoerk 11 August 4th, 2007 12:33 AM
Sigma 300mm F2.8 on Canon 5D Kevin_B1 Canon Eos Mount DSLRs 6 August 1st, 2006 04:09 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Posting images and text grants limited license to OPF , while the © of these individual items remains with the originator, all the assembled content Copyright 2006-2013 Asher Kelman (all rights reserved)