![]() |
|
HOME
FORUMS
NEWS
FAQ
SEARCH
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello,
I've been taking photos for my travels, been moving around for 4 years and currently in New Zealand, partly with motorized transport and partly on my bicycle. Recently I've picked up spherical photography, and started designing a panohead for a compact setup. I just bought a sony NEX-c3, my first interchangeable lens camera for the panohead project I'm working on but I'm having a horrible time trying to clean the lenses. I haven't bothered cleaning lenses before, but this time with a more expensive camera and lenses I thought I'd give it a try, but everything I do seems to make it worse! I bought ROR residual oil remover and pec pads with a microfiber cloth but the ROR leaves behind a whole lot of residue that seems to attract more oil and dirt. The more I wipe or reapply the worse it gets. I tried it on my filter, fisheye, 18-55mm, LCD, and GGS screen protector and they're all now covered in swirls. I was going crazy yesterday trying to get the stuff off. The screen protector is now incredibly scratched after 10 minutes of wiping it, I'm not sure if this is because of the ROR, the cloth I'm using, or maybe because the screen protector is a fake plastic imitation. I've tried washing out the microfiber cloths with detergent but it doesn't help. I'm going to try tossing them into the laundry and see if it helps, but I'm at a lost as to what to do. I'm afraid to look too closely at the lens in case I find scratches like on the screen protector. I've ordered some Eclipse, and thinking about getting 3M microfiber lens cleaning cloth, but they'll both take a week to ship. The cloth in the photo below was from an Ebay seller in china and was labeled "3M scotchbrite" and looks similar but it leaves behind a lot of lint. ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi, Thomas,
Your lens cleaning situation is sure disappointing. I see that the manufacturer of ROR calls for the use of "a lens cleaning cloth or tissue", as well as untreated micro-fiber cloths. Best regards, Doug |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
HiThomas,
I'm so sorry to hear of you problem. Likely as not, your Sony lens is glass and well protected against scratches from your cloth. The plastic over the screen could be scratched, but that s often reparable by a coating to fill in the scratches. I'd contact the MFR of your RDR with a link to this page and ask them for the solution. Now I've done some investigation it appears that ROR works well in many situations but can be inconsistent and leave this mess. Here's an example!. But there's more in a photo.net article and discussion on Camera Cleaning and ROR comes under suspicion for ether spreading some material dissolved from synthetic fibers or even perhaps possibly dissolving previous lens coatings. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I usually clean lenses by:
-first blowing or gently brushing any dust off -fog the lens by blowing on it -wipe with a used cotton handkerchief or old T-shirt Works very well. If they is salt on the lens (droplets from the sea... very bad, but may happen): wipe with a wet cloth first. If you really, really have lots of oily residue, ethyl alcohol (the stuff you can drink as Vodka) works fine enough. If your filters don't get any better when cleaned with alcohol, just get new ones. It is not worth the effort. The screen cover of your Nex is plastic and can be repolished. Lay a cotton rag on a flat surface (the edge of a table is fine), apply tooth paste and a little bit of water and polish with circular motions. Don't try to get all the cracks out, that is lots of work. The screen cover can also be exchanged and that is relatively cheap. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I went to the pharmacy and supermarket and bought isopropyl alcohol and water to mix, hopefully to try to get rid of the stuff on my lens. What percentage of isopropyl is safe to use on the lens?
The isopropyl claims to be 100% but I am very skeptical, I also had to pay $7 for 50ml which is ridiculous when back home in the US i can buy a 1L bottle of 70% for $2. I couldn't find distilled water, the only "pure" water I could find was something which claims to be less than 1mg of solids per liter, for $2. New Zealand is quite backwards by 2 decades, think 1990s (bandwidth limits!). I'm thinking I will start with a 20% mix and then go up to 50% if I need to. Ironically ROR is has 5% Isopropyl. ![]()
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Welcome to OPF. I'm looking forward to seeing some of your images here on OPF, and your panohead (collar) looks interesting. I do wonder if the no-parallax point happens to align with the rotation axis of the collar. Quote:
The LCD cover can be manufactured from a kind of plastic, which will scratch easier than glass. On the positive side, if it can be scratched easily, it can also be polished. There are often suitable polishers available in phoneshops for phone displays. A common brand available in my geography is called Displex. You indeed should spend some time getting the fisheye lens clean, but try and not damage the coating. Grease solvents like RoR, might chemically react with the coating, so I'd stay away from that. Because the fisheye covers a huge angle of view, it's usually picking up lightsources and a dirty lens will create veiling glare, which will kill image contrast. Good luck with the cleaning attempts. Cheers, Bart
__________________
If you do what you did, you'll get what you got. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Bart,
The panohead holds the Samyang lens at the no-parallax-point at the horizon. The NPP moves around depending on the angle of entry, the NPP for the nadir and zenith is a millimeter in front of the NPP for the horizon, but the amount of error isn't much and i think all fisheyes have the same issue. With regards to cleaning, I read that some people have used 99% isopropyl, so I might use the bottle I bought from the pharmacy directly with a pec-pad without diluting it, although I don't have an easy way to get it on the pad except by dipping or pouring it. I looked up the materials data sheet for Eclipse and it's 100% methanol. I didn't look closely but the pharmacist told me there was methanol stuff also next to the iso, so I might go back to the pharmacy to have a look tomorrow, although I might get impatient and go ahead and crack open the isoproyl to try it. I read on other forums that the methanol in Eclipse is supposedly highly pure. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...1&changemode=1 |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't use more than a drop or two on a Pec-pad. We're talking about slightly damp, not wet. Also, always apply to the pad, not directly on the lens, and try to not touch the surface of the Pec-pad that's going to be touching the lens. Quote:
Cheers, Bart
__________________
If you do what you did, you'll get what you got. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I retried the lenspen and it was amazing. it cleaned everything off, but now its saturated and doesn't work anymore, so I'll be ordering another one. I cleaned 10 highly smeared surfaces. Has anyone tried the non-branded lens pens, or should i only go for the original LensPen brand?
The Isopropyl did not help with the ROR residue, although it did take off fingerprints off the screen, but it did leave residue too. The lenspen cleaned it up.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I find that the microfibre cloths do not do as good a job as the hype leads one to expect. I have always used Selvyt cloths for optical cleaning - camera lenses, binocuolars etc. PR or SR, but not the microfibre versions. They are available in the US.
The beauty of these is that they are virtually lintless. The problem with the mf versions is that the fibres are synthetic and non-absorbent. With natural fibres the fibres absorb the humidity and this makes the polishing action so much better. Normally, a little breathing on the lens is enough 'cleaning liquid', but I use approx 100% isopropyl alchohol where an inevitable partial fingerprint happens - usually coincident with little people being in the house! |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
So is there any preference or advantages for lenses using PR versus SR grades of Selvyt cloths? Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi, Thomas,
Quote:
http://www.lenspen.com/media/IS-20_L...0-%20Final.pdf Best regards, Doug |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ref: PR vs SR Selvyt.
I don't think there is that much difference, but I have only used PR for many years and only had one SR before that. I mistrust the Selvyt microfibre simply by extension: I have tried one or two supposedly high quality other brands and found that their lack of absorbancy means they can polish but not clean. I suppose unfair on the Selvyt MF, but I see no reason that they would be any different from any other microfibre. The PR and SR Selvyt cloths are made from long-strand (Egyptian?) cotton and just leave no flecks. I notice that they do a special version which is the same but is impregnated with something, but I have not tried it. Goodness, I sound like a salesman for Selvyt. Let us just say that in UK, you will hardly find anyone, who has to clean and polish lenses professionally, that doesn't use Selvyt. Here endeth my sales pitch and if anyone from Selvyt reads this, just post a PM for my bank account details. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|