• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

I'm Getting Antsy

P

Peter Dexter

Well-known member
For a number of years now I've been using a Canon 7D ll for my bird photography with a Canon 400 5.6 (I would consider popping for much more expensive glass if it met one criteria: as light or lighter than my current lens but not available to my knowledge.) I was delighted by the announcement of Canon's new duo and thought well lets go, lighter weight and higher pixel count. But then I looked around on some forums and was told no, not a good idea. Wait for a Canon 7D lll. The new duo don't have the same or better focusing ability as the 7D ll. Any thoughts on this?
 
Asher Kelman

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
To me, what counts the most, to justify the camera is lightweight long-reach telephoto lenses!

Yes, the pro bodies, DSLR or mirrorless provide more advanced AF, but the 7DII is already stellar.

Otherwise your camera is perfect!

Asher
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top