Klaus Esser
pro member
This is one i like - i shot it with a Hasselblad and a 350mm Tele-Tessar on Kodak EPP and made it b&w in Photoshop after scanning.
bst, Klaus
bst, Klaus
Hi Klaus,
Why do you like this one? Why is it cropped that way. What would you do to make it better? (just trying to get you to 'push your boundaries')
Best wishes,
Ray
Hi Klaus,
It reminds me very much of a certain painting, of about 500 years ago. Just by luck, in a split second, you get something akin to what took 40 years or so back then- ah, its the camera.
Best wishes,
Ray
Klaus,
This is a strong image. I like the woman that looks ahead with no exploitation, no objectification, she has style from her hair and attitude from her eyes, lips and almost discerning smile.
I could talk about things that are off perfection, but then that's what it is, a real portrait. I can imagine that this is a woman of value and worth.
I have no doubt about her femininity but am glad to be able to appreciate her and such a personal way without sexuality being obvious. She has authority and understanding and I like her a lot.
Asher
Thats a beautiful Portrait, I love the crop, the tones, and her expression, it looks one of deep contentment. For me this is just what a Portrait should be like.
Emma James
Thats a beautiful Portrait, I love the crop, the tones, and her expression, it looks one of deep contentment. For me this is just what a Portrait should be like.
Emma James
.. so, what is a Sommersprossen?
I like the angle of the face and the eyes going looking to one side.
There is too much grain in the face -- remember, 'push your boundaries'-- Im sure there is none in the original.
I don't think the frame is the best, If you only have this can probably continue cropping her right side
all the way to the beginning of the hair.
to brake the simetric (why is my spell check not accepting simetric, how is it? )
ciao
Not sure I should re reply to this, wether it is 'etiquette' or not, but I feel this portrait is worthy of my impertenence! I think this face deserves to have the space around it, most would be tempted to have shot this in vertical, even obeying 'thirds' for some obscure reason ( personally I think the rule book should be thrown out when shooting Portaits, theres is too much personality involved to slap a 'thirds' rule onto it). The grain just reminds me of a good quality contrasty paper for film users, and if her face was sharp the whole portrait would be lost. This piece of work is so far removed from a typical modern day 'digital photograph' that it makes me want to throw away my DSLR and use my husbands old nikon film camera.
Emma James