• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

San Diego Skyline

Bill Miller

New member
As seen from Harbor Island. Star of India is on left side and Hyatt on far right. This is only 2 panels of a 4 panel Pano. The 4 Panel includes the Coronado Bridge on the right.

Shot w/Canon 1Ds

SanDiego_2panel_4x19.jpg
 
Last edited:

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Hi Bill,

I love this wide view of the San Diego sky line. There is just enough light on the water to get a sense of the bay. Overall it's impressive. How did you make it?

I'd consider a slight brightening perhaps to show of the lights and add a sliver more of significance to the water.

Thanks for sharing!

Asher
 

Bill Miller

New member
Hi Bill,

I love this wide view of the San Diego sky line. There is just enough light on the water to get a sense of the bay. Overall it's impressive. How did you make it?

I'd consider a slight brightening perhaps to show of the lights and add a sliver more of significance to the water.

Thanks for sharing!

Asher

Reducing this from 300 DPI to has lost some of the lightness. This was created from 2 shots. The full Pano is 4 panels and is 49"w x 7"h - It was shot at f22 ISO 100 130mm 1 Sec exposure.

Here is a different shot at f18 200mm 1.sec

SanDiegoNite.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Reducing this from 300 DPI to has lost some of the lightness. This was created from 2 shots. The full Pano is 4 panels and is 49"w x 7"h - It was shot at f22 ISO 100 130mm 1 Sec exposure.

Here is a different shot at f18 200mm 1.sec

SanDiegoNite.jpg

Hi Bill,

The second picture of the San Diego skyline is more impressive. We now have a presence, a feeling that this city is massive, alive and surrounds us. It's color and stature works to capture and hold out attention and gives pleasure to ponder. So first of all I'm impressed and love the image you have shared!

Now some technical questions on your choices in taking the picture. Since you were likely using an excellent lens and a tripod, perhaps with the mirror locked up, you have everything in order for getting the finest image as there will be no blur from movement or the shutter vibration. Under these conditions, a tiny aperture can degrade all your good work. If you were using a lesser camera, diffraction likely would be a lesser problem.

So why did you choose f22 where you are bound to be risking diffraction limits? It seems to me that you could improved your photograph with an aperture of f 11 or more open.

Asher
 

Bill Miller

New member
Asher,

If I remember correctly, no mirror lockup, and f22 was used to capture maximum detail. Exposure was caculated by spotmetering downtown and using an average. Really simple no consideration to diffraction or vibration.
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Asher,

If I remember correctly, no mirror lockup, and f22 was used to capture maximum detail. Exposure was caculated by spotmetering downtown and using an average. Really simple no consideration to diffraction or vibration.
Hi Bill,

With a pixel pitch of 9 µm your 1Ds is a darn site better than the latest cameras. However, to get the best out of your lenses with this camera, to achieve the finest detail, no more than f11 or f 13 for a print 20" wide!

Asher
 

debbie boren

New member
Hi Bill,

The second picture of the Omni San Diego skyline is more impressive. We now have a presence, a feeling that this city is massive, alive and surrounds us. It's color and stature works to capture and hold out attention and gives pleasure to ponder. So first of all I'm impressed and love the image you have shared!

Now some technical questions on your choices in taking the picture. Since you were likely using an excellent lens and a tripod, perhaps with the mirror locked up, you have everything in order for getting the finest image as there will be no blur from movement or the shutter vibration. Under these conditions, a tiny aperture can degrade all your good work. If you were using a lesser camera, diffraction likely would be a lesser problem.

So why did you choose f22 where you are bound to be risking diffraction limits? It seems to me that you could improved your photograph with an aperture of f 11 or more open.

Asher


A bit off topic but having to do with San Diego Skylines...
Can anyone recommend a good, moderately priced, camera that would be good for skyline photography?
Many thanks,
Deborah
 

Asher Kelman

OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
Debbie,

Hi and welcome to OPF as I see this is your first post. for skyline photography one would either use stitching of adjacent overlapping views or else a camera with a wide angle lens. An example of this would be the GX200 a Ricoh camera which has a lens that goes down to 24 mm and with an adapter all the way to 21 mm. However, a Canon G10 would do the same down to 28 mm and an add on lens take it somewhat wider.

Actually it's not at all necessary to have such a wide lens. Almost all modern digcams have an option for panoramas. This mode gives overlapping frame guides with the old picture and where you should frame the new shot to continue to panoramic scene.

There's software such as

Photoshop (go to file, automate and then) it's on the submenu right there an option to stitch a set of overlapping frames.

Autopano pro, a software program from France in English that works very well and is simple to use but has powerful options.

For these shots, you can just as well, (or even to advantage), a 50 mm lens and just have more pictures to stitch. Use the picture with the camera in "Portrait" position and stitch those frames to give a more detail-rich image.

Of course, you can also rent a Fuji or other panoramic film camera 6x17 cm or a Hassleblad 35 mm pano film camera and do this all with one shot!

In any way you do it, have fun!

Asher

Please say Hi in the "Introduce yourself" forum and tell us where you are from what you do and share some images!
 
Top