Larry Smith
New member
I would appreciate an explanation for the prohibition of posts addressed specifically to Chuck Westfall.
Since he intends to participate, and is the primary if not only "real" conduit most of us have to Canon re. suggestion-consideration, etc., ...it seems that he would appreciate "flagging" of posts relative to such, rather than relying on happenstance stumbling-over posts to which he might wish to reply.
This "open letter" approach, specifically addressed, also alerts all members to the fact that some info may be forthcoming, from someone who is particularly well established as an authority.
I, for one, find this very helpful.
Why the "ban"?
Thanks,
Larry
Since he intends to participate, and is the primary if not only "real" conduit most of us have to Canon re. suggestion-consideration, etc., ...it seems that he would appreciate "flagging" of posts relative to such, rather than relying on happenstance stumbling-over posts to which he might wish to reply.
This "open letter" approach, specifically addressed, also alerts all members to the fact that some info may be forthcoming, from someone who is particularly well established as an authority.
I, for one, find this very helpful.
Why the "ban"?
Thanks,
Larry