Asher Kelman
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
I have been look at http://www.DXOmark.com and have come to wonder why on earth the 5D firmware has not been revamped to take advantage of all the software progress that went into the 5DII. Look at the various sensitivity curves of noise, Dynamic range, color sensitivity etc, the 5DII follows the 5D closely except that the math for the 5DII extends it's operation to much higher ISO levels.
Considering the larger pixel size of the Nikon D3 and D700 compared to the D3x is reflected in higher performance of the lesser D700 and the D3 compared to their flagship, I'd expect that the 5D with large pixels would trounce the 5DII in color sensitivity. Why not? They haven't upgraded the firmware, I expect!
I wish we had open platforms for 3rd part firmware development! Imagine what one might be able to do! Surely the 5DII is as good as it is not only because of better electronics and silicon. I would bet that more advanced software is a major reason and it is simply not made available to the 5D! I'd pay for it, just like we pay for good lenses!
Asher
Considering the larger pixel size of the Nikon D3 and D700 compared to the D3x is reflected in higher performance of the lesser D700 and the D3 compared to their flagship, I'd expect that the 5D with large pixels would trounce the 5DII in color sensitivity. Why not? They haven't upgraded the firmware, I expect!
I wish we had open platforms for 3rd part firmware development! Imagine what one might be able to do! Surely the 5DII is as good as it is not only because of better electronics and silicon. I would bet that more advanced software is a major reason and it is simply not made available to the 5D! I'd pay for it, just like we pay for good lenses!
Asher
Last edited: