Damien
big grin about your categories... ;-)
I might add, that LR vs PS depends much on the typ of photography as well; as a press photographer - with a quite big amount of photos to be converted every day, I wouldn't probably care much about PS. With a rel. small image size to be printed, it wouldn't make a such big difference.
But beeing a photographer working for architects, artist, etc, beeing published in magazines, catalogs, up-rez etc.... I spend in the average > 1 h in PS after the RAWconversion, for a single image, only:
local contrast adjustments, wide angle lens distortion corrections, merging different bracket shots for a extended dynamic range, stitching, correcting mixedlighted images etc, hasn't to do anything with pixelpeeping, but just the attitude, to make best out of your captured material. LR just isn't made for these things. So its horses for courses...
BTW: LR isn't the only RAW converter, in natural light conditions, I prefer C1 Vers 4.