Hello Cedric; I join Asher in lauding your pursuit of a contiguous body of images. (It's such a wonderful visual and intellectual relief from the 1-off reflexive look-what-I-caught-today happy snaps vastly more common on Internet forums.)
This is the type of project I enjoy seeing. As is appropriate and customary in the art world I'll not critique specific images but, rather, comment on the overall body of work, making allusions to specific images as needed.
I like your apparent approach on this subject. A place that's clearly teeming with humanity but images that, with only one exception, only show humanity's evidence. ("Evidentiary imagery" as it's termed.) Whether that's by your cenceptual design or due to shyness of photographing strangers in unfamiliar settings is not clear to me.
The most compelling scene of this group is that of the empty swimming pool. I have to believe that there are stronger possibilities in that setting from different points of view and captured in different light. That would be the sample that would guide me forward.
The first image should be tossed. It's not well crafted at all and offers no meaning to the study whatsoever.
Offhand here are my suggestions if you want to move forward from this concept, Cedric.
1. Make sure your purpose perspective remains intact. These images are wandering back and forth between "pretty", "scenic/tourist", and genuinely conceptually productive. Don't let your lens be seduced by "pretty" unless it that's what you want to capture (in which case you should just go back to the city and avoid these dreary places!). Also, don't be seduced by pure geometry (a close cousin of "pretty") unless, again, it honestly reinforces the project body.
2. Different light, different times of day, perhaps twilight or night. I realize that these areas may not be the friendliest places for outsiders. I also realize that you don't appear to want to engage the residents. But the images you've presented look as though they were all captured during a 30-minute walk-through. You need more depth of study.
3. Be more brutal with your editing (shot selection).
4. At some point perhaps closer to when you feel this project is complete you'll need to address some earnest post-processing . Most of these images, for example, suffer from deep and distracting blue casts. You have a tendency to shoot on the shade side of objects which you should recognize and control.
Thank you for posting this work, Cedric. I cheer you onward! If we had more such conceptual proojects posted and discussed here OPF would really be a far richer and more rewarding photography site than any other venue today.