Open Photography Forums  
HOME FORUMS NEWS FAQ SEARCH

Go Back   Open Photography Forums > OPF Welcome Hall > Breaking News

Breaking News Updates, innovations, equipment: moderated!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 16th, 2012, 11:10 AM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is offline
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32,737
Default In Cariou v. Prince, an Appeal to Clarify a Crucial Fair Use Boundary

Photo District News has an important article on the issue of copyrighted photographs being exploited without permission by the new artists claiming to be working in the public benefit high minded circle of "Fair Use" which is mean for editorial comment, discussion, critique, education and the like.



Prince re-purposed Cariou's images in different ways and to varying degrees.

In this image, he appropriated Cariou's photo "in its entirety," the
photographer says, noting that Prince testified that the subject of his work
was the guitar--and that his intent wasn't to comment on Cariou's photograph.
That lack of reference to the original photographs disqualifies Prince's work as
fair use, Cariou says. But Prince counters that his work offers "dramatically
new esthetics" and "strikingly different messages" from Carious photographs
--and that is enough to satisfy an important test for fair use. Prince, once
again is at court, appealing $11,000,0000 judgement in against him.


Read more here

Google and other media monsters have filed, "Friends of court briefs" supporting Prince in his scavenges use of the photographer's work!

So how does this work in other countries? What if Prince sold his work in France or the U.K., for example or someone imports such a picture and someone reports it!

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 18th, 2012, 12:09 PM
Ben Rubinstein Ben Rubinstein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 1,540
Default

'Appropriation Artist', says it all. Where are the tar and feathers when you need them?
__________________
Ben Rubinstein
Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com
Blog: http://thedustylenscap.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 18th, 2012, 01:55 PM
Asher Kelman Asher Kelman is offline
OPF Owner/Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32,737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Rubinstein View Post
'Appropriation Artist', says it all. Where are the tar and feathers when you need them?
Ben,

Picasso was inspired by Matisse's sculptures of heads. However, he made how own work.

So, what's the law in the U.K., or other places you know of? We sometimes get to think that USA law is all important. What could be purchased in the USA could lead to arrest in the U.K., perhaps if the laws are inconsistent and a French, German or UK photograph was "appropriated".

Asher
__________________
Follow us on Twitter at @opfweb

Our purpose is getting to an impressive photograph. So we encourage browsing and then feedback. Consider a link to your galleries annotated, C&C welcomed. Images posted within OPF are assumed to be for Comment & Critique, unless otherwise designated.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:17 AM.


Posting images or text grants license to OPF, yet of such remain with its creator. Still, all assembled discussion 2006-2017 Asher Kelman (all rights reserved) Posts with new theme or unusual image might be moved/copied to a new thread!