• Please use real names.

    Greetings to all who have registered to OPF and those guests taking a look around. Please use real names. Registrations with fictitious names will not be processed. REAL NAMES ONLY will be processed

    Firstname Lastname

    Register

    We are a courteous and supportive community. No need to hide behind an alia. If you have a genuine need for privacy/secrecy then let me know!
  • Welcome to the new site. Here's a thread about the update where you can post your feedback, ask questions or spot those nasty bugs!

Photographer as terrorist?

M

Mike Funnell

New member
Hmm.. Another case of "a crime so awful that actual innocence is no defence?" Its hard to tell when no evidence has been presented. But I do wonder why it hasn't, especially after all this time.
 
B

Bart_van_der_Wolf

pro member
Mike Funnell said:
Its hard to tell when no evidence has been presented. But I do wonder why it hasn't, especially after all this time.
Click to expand...

Well, without knowing the evidence, circumstantial or not, it's hard to say. But then it is also hard to prove something you haven't done, so reversing the burdon of proof is not allowed in a civilized justice system. That's why I strongly believe in the "innocent untill proven guilty" presumption, especially against an allmighy government. The accuser should proof his claim, the defendant doesn't have to disprove a thing.

Conclusion, no proof, no case.

Bart
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top