Well, Cem and Charlotte,
You have both grabbed my attention with your work!
First, Charlotte,
Your orignal, thanks goodness, has not be distorted by photoshop! That's a first an important consideration! Let's protect work from filters whenever possible. Black and white works so well and gives us more attention to form, texture and thoughts underlying the work.
Your picture here has glorious disorder! It shows the cluttered background from which she has to emerge as she grows. She has to survive, in a way, the givens and detritus of our two generations above here.
BTW, I'd have added fill light to at least allow her face some divinity.
Cem,
Cem,
Your own effort is remarkable. It starts with empathy and that makes for motivation. After all, we're all busy with lots to pull us away.
Your edited version of Charlotte's lone ballerina, is magnificent like a delicate butterfly, with feeling for the fragility for the young girl. This tenderness comes, I believe, from being a devoted father. You want to remove barriers for this child and so level the playing field, so to speak so she can dance.
Degas would love it!
So is there a general lesson from this photograph? I think it's this.
Art is a multistep process. Ideas have to incubate and we need the work to be able to impact on our hands and mind in the physicality of it as it's being built from the image that the dumb/smart, (but uninformed), silicon potentially records.
Allow the first image that appears a voice and then ask, "How this might be presented best?"
So which picture means more to you Charlotte? The original or Cem's version? Had you thought enough of the photographs processing? Maybe you had. Still I'd like to know.
Asher