D
Deleted member 55
Guest
Here we go!
EF 50MM f1.2L Prime 1/60 f4.0 ISO 400 1DsMKIII MR14EX Ringlight
EF 50MM f1.2L Prime 1/60 f4.0 ISO 400 1DsMKIII MR14EX Ringlight
Precious! The model is exquisite and I like the pose very much.Here we go!
EF 50MM f1.2L Prime 1/60 f4.0 ISO 400 1DsMKIII MR14EX Ringlight
Here we go!
EF 50MM f1.2L Prime 1/60 f4.0 ISO 400 1DsMKIII MR14EX Ringlight
To all:
This shot turned out just as intended with no editing and custom white balance set on location with a gray card.
Still the color is accurate!
Meaning what: that white balance color correction was applied based on a neutral target in a test scene?Still the color is accurate!
Hi, Will,
Meaning what: that white balance color correction was applied based on a neutral target in a test scene?
I have no idea what the reflective color of the white of the model's eye is. If I use that as the basis for white balance color correction, I don't like the result on the whole shot. And of course the viewer won't perceive the eyes as "yellowish" in this context, surrounded by orange stuff.
I think the chromaticity of eye whites is of no concern on its own unless it contributes to an "unnatural" appearance of the image (or of course alerts us to some serious medical problem on the part of the subject).
(there is no such thing as R>255. although of course I know what was meant).
If it can't be beyond 255, then RGB properly captures all colors? When converting from LAB to rgb, you always capture all colors because there is not such thing as R>255, B>255, or G>255? If something is blown out and RGB shows 255 in all channels, then we know that is true correct color? There are no imaginary colors, colors that go beyond gamut?
some very fast editing, masking and changing the background color to something more complementary to the skintone and shirt.Here we go!
EF 50MM f1.2L Prime 1/60 f4.0 ISO 400 1DsMKIII MR14EX Ringlight
If it can't be beyond 255, then RGB properly captures all colors? When converting from LAB to rgb, you always capture all colors because there is not such thing as R>255, B>255, or G>255? If something is blown out and RGB shows 255 in all channels, then we know that is true correct color? There are no imaginary colors, colors that go beyond gamut?
I assume this is in response to my mention that we cannot have R>255. It's true, and I didn't mean anything beyond that.
Of course, if in an RGB color space one of the coordinates is at 255, we can be pretty sure that the actual color (lets say, as represented in the raw data from the sensor chain) is beyond the RGB space gamut (and I know that's what you probably meant).
But no, in an RGB color space, we can never have R>255.
D'accord!I still maintain that the value is beyond 255. It is beyond what can be measured and represented in RGB. Nothing more.
some very fast editing, masking and changing the background color to something more complementary to the skintone and shirt.
Me too.
And I think we're missing an important point.
For all the seemingly well intended color analysis and image editing, Will stated some time ago: "This shot turned out just as intended ...".
Will won't post much if you mess with his images.
If he wanted a green wall and white eyes, he's shoot it that way.