Thanks for the feedback Joe.
I agree with you about the floor and the shallow feel to the image because of the lack of well defined shadows.
I often find that it takes me multiple visits to a location to get the shot I have pictured in my mind and this initial image is not what the final image will look like. This was taken about an hour before sunset, but I think if I take the shot in the hour after sunrise the light will be coming from a much better direction (that's my plan for this Saturday morning).
Glad that you like the composition. That was something I was hoping that there would be a comment on.
My own feeling it that there is something missing, that perhaps I should add another element for additional interest in what is a fairly simple image (not simple as in weak image, but simple as in you instantly get it and move on). If I add something, or partially add something, then I might be able to strenghten the image.
Coming from a forensic background, I was thinking for example of lying down on the ground and just having one forearm and hand along with a foot appear from the left side of the frame like there is a body there that you can only partly see. It would totally change the feel of the composition, but might make for an interesting alternative, especially if I also drop a knife down in the lower right part of the frame. Then I could position the camera at a higher spot and shoot down a little more, removing some of the top of the image which is very same-same to me.
So I guess I see this as a good location for an image, but this first example is not a good image.
Anyway, I plan on going back to this spot several times, so I think I'll keep this thread going as the image progresses. As it progresses it may no longer really be an architecture image, because the subject may change significantly, so I may ask Asher to move the thread at some point.
Regards,
Peter